Aurora Reflections – Leaning into Imposter Syndrome

Our guest speaker on day 2 of Aurora was Melanie Eusebe MBE – a great speaker who had a really engaging style. She had three points for us (which I won’t spoil for future Aurorans), which included a suggestion that if we’re feeling imposter syndrome then we may need to see this as a challenge that will develop us further.

I have heard the “fake it ’til you make it” approach to imposter syndrome before, and also how important it is to speak up to help others understand that we all have these concerns. Melanie’s suggestion that we use it as a development tool was a new one to me, and as I thought more about it, I realised that leaning into imposter syndrome does several things:

Helps us identify our strengths

Imposter syndrome is about feeling that we can’t do things that we can actually do. Some of those things are well within our grasp (it’s just a pesky internal voice telling us we’re not good enough) but there are also things that are more difficult but still achievable. If we never stretch ourselves, we will struggle to tell the difference between a self-sabotaging “you can’t do this” voice when we are capable, and a natural caution we feel in trying something new.

If we regularly move outside of our comfort zone into things that are more of a challenge for us, we should begin to identify the difference between the sabotaging voice and the cautious voice. When we can reliably recognise the voice that tells us we’re not good enough, we can start to understand that these things aren’t our weaknesses, and might actually be some of our strengths.

Helps us find and target our challenges

Imposter syndrome flags when we think we’re not so good at something and we can use this to examine our fears more closely. Being able to identify the difference between the sabotaging voice (when we’re doing an activity that’s within our abilities – see above), and the cautious voice (when we’re stretching ourselves) can help us set aside the unhelpful noise and concentrate our efforts on where we can actually improve. When we recognise that we are being sensibly cautious about something, we can then target it with preparation, training or other tools.

Helps us feel more used to that discomfort

Using imposter syndrome to help us develop, isn’t about going completely out of our depth immediately. We should think about it more as building up our resilience to the feelings that we have around challenging work. As we push ourselves towards bigger challenges we’re going to feel uncomfortable, but being familiar with the sensation, and recognising that in ourselves will make it less troublesome.

After just two jobs in 18 years at the University, I felt very much out of my depth in my first few weeks in my new team. I began to panic that I’d made the wrong move and that I wasn’t suited to the role. It was only when speaking to friends and family (who had all moved jobs more frequently than I) did I learn that these feelings were normal and that I should expect to feel that way for at least 6 months. If I’d had more experience of pushing myself into new roles, then I would have understood that these feelings were normal, and worried a lot less!

So it is possible to harness the discomfort around imposter syndrome in ways that can help us build skills and improve our practice. Start by examining it, discarding the noise, listen to what it’s telling you about the real challenges you’re currently facing, and get used to the sensation. That we can see pushing ourselves as a positive challenge to embrace, rather than an uncomfortable one to be avoided.

Aurora Day 2 – Identity, Impact and Voice

This was the first full-day Aurora session, officially running from 10-3 but with additional questions running until 3.30.

The session is entitled Identity, Impact and Voice. The pre-work was very much focused on identity (which is something that I’d like to develop) and examples of good practice that we’d seen in our institutions and I was excited to discuss these. Unfortunately there wasn’t much on these topics. It felt like a lot of the pre-work wasn’t relevant to the session, and we weren’t asked to reflect on what we’d prepared.

However there was plenty of helpful advice on presenting yourself well through video and through use of your voice and we were given some brief breakout room opportunities to try good and bad practice. The lead presenter was obviously well experienced in delivering on this sort of training.

Some of the takeaways that I found useful:

  • Sometimes you may be leading on something that you hadn’t realised. The presenter gave an example whereby a person who organised a charity run event, didn’t see that she was acting as a leader on it. She brought lots of people onboard to the idea, lead with a vision of it being a family friendly and alcohol free event which she was able to engage others in this idea. She felt that she didn’t do much of the organising of the peripheral parts, but she had actually aligned others with her vision and they had also got behind the event which was leadership.
  • Leadership and Management can be seen as different. Generally management is more practical, whilst leadership is more strategic. However vision on strategy needs to be backed up with practical actions or it doesn’t go anywhere.
  • Eye contact is important when presenting – but do it carefully. Neurodiverse people can find eye contact distracting or uncomfortable. Online it can be faked through camera positioning, but in person it’s best to find one or two people who return your eye contact and build rapport with them.
  • Projection of self worth can be delivered through Stillness / Stance / Speed / Space
    • Calm measured voice – taking time to pause for people to absorb what you’re saying
    • Purposeful delivery – Not apologetic or too self deprecating – you have a right to speak
    • Still and confident in body language – with eye contact
  • Managing interruptions – Act as an ally for the interrupted, look away from the interrupter, put own hand up to indicate that you’ve not finished. We should also be conscious of own actions, especially with regard to contributors from minority groups – amplify their voices.

I also enjoyed the guest speaker and I’ve written about some of my reflections on Melanie Eusebe’s talk in a separate post.

Although this session wasn’t quite what I’d expected, there were still some useful ideas to take away. I’m hoping the next session on Core Leadership will develop on some of the less explored ideas a bit more…